We are searching data for your request:
Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
A few large American insurance companies have launched a campaign against birth control and programmed cesarean section before week 39."He's ruthless? He clues here, clues there? Can't you sleep well from him? Your tummy will be too big? Get him out!" It is not uncommon in the United States to have a baby or a womb before the 37th week of pregnancy for any health reason. This tendency is intensifying, despite the fact that parenting and framing before the term is a very risky operation. Currently, cesarean section is the most commonly performed operation in the United States. (Today, every third birth has a cesarean section.) One of the reasons for this is the increasing prevalence of early childbirth. Pregnancy is advancing at an increasingly early stage of pregnancy, thus increasing the risk of further interventions and the baby becoming increasingly demented.
Every day spent in the life of the fetus was counted in recent years
The insured turned me inAn average cesarean section costs $ 24,300, while a regular cubicle costs $ 15,200. Insurers - as their money is at stake - have noticed rising costs. Aetna, the third largest insurance company in the United States, has found a very simple solution: it is defined by the cesarean section and the vaginal birth rate. Thus the financial interest of the hospital ceases. Cigna also took similar measures, awarding credit points to hospitals that reduce the proportion of births or cesarean sections prior to week 39. The insurers also produce educational materials and films for mothers.
- First we said, okay, let's start it a couple of days after the 39th week! - says Eliot Main, a senior physician at California Pacific Medical Center in Newcastle. - Then we try at week 38, then at 37. We went back and forth year after year…
There are several reasons for the increase in the proportion of cuttings and births. Women are born today, doctors and patients are looking for a comfortable solution, and insurers are paying more for interventions. Meanwhile, we think that cesarean section is a safe alternative to vaginal birth.
Everything for comfort?
Parenting or conceiving may, of course, be justified if the health of the mother and / or baby is at risk. The cup is inevitable, for example, in the case of a supine or forward flank, or if the mother is struggling with high blood pressure. However, these cases do not cover the 33-percentile rate, nor does it justify that the number of births has doubled over the last two decades.
- Doctors divert a lot of mothers for a variety of reasons, either from the birth or the planned cup. But if you look closely, it turns out that there is no health reason in the background says Jill.
Lately, more and more research suggests that a baby born before week 39 is putting the baby at risk. The risk of post-partum complications (among others, dyspnoea, infections) is twice as high at week 38 and quadruple at 37.
In addition, the initiation leads to longer and more painful labor and requires much more intervention than in the case of naturally-initiated parenting. The statistics also prove that twice as many induced births have cesarean delivery than naturally born births.
According to a civilian Leapfrog Group survey, cesarean section or intrauterine delivery performed prior to week 39 occurred without any medical reason in the past year.
Can I organize my work schedule against a healthy baby?Insurance professionals want to see what motivates doctors to start a baby or to have a premature cesarean as soon as possible. Not only does cesarean section pay more, but it also makes doctors' lives more comfortable. It is easier to set up your work schedule if you have scheduled births and dates for your operations. It is certainly certain that a pediatrician will be available at this time, who will also raise the fee. We want to avoid bug defects, so you better think for sure. It follows that many institutions are also reluctant to the possibility of postpartum cervical birth.
And home?At home, "ruthless bastard, take it out!" in baby boomers, though more and more are perceived as cesarean section being an equal alternative to vaginal birth. What is surprising, however, is that the proportion of cesarean sections in more than 40 hospitals is even more than half where babies are born with cesarean section. (You'll find the data in the Finder.)
It is believed that even in Hungary, if health insurance were in the hands of the insurers, the number of interventions and compliments would not be eliminated. In the meantime, money is falling into the hole guard, as moms and, of course, newborns can count on more and more complications, discomfort, and pain.
This article is based on Businessweek нrбsa.